A Gentleman in Moscow by Amor Towles
"If a man does not master his circumstances, then he is bound to be mastered by them." Count Alexander Rostov
After some rather heavy reading - someone suggested -A Gentleman in Moscow - and I found it so delightful but thought provoking as well. I just finished it this past weekend.
And it sparked this series as I thought about it more.
The premise of the novel is almost unbelievable and to be honest- absurd. Count Alexander Rostov, an aristocrat in post-Revolutionary Russia, is sentenced to spend the rest of his life under house arrest in Moscow's luxurious Metropol Hotel. He can never leave its doors. If he does, he will be executed.
From that unlikely setting, Amor Towles tells such a simple tale (which made me link it to A Tree Grows in Brooklyn).
At first glance, the novel appears to be about politics. It certainly has much to say about revolutions, totalitarianism, and the rise of Soviet Russia. But the deeper story isn't political at all.
It's about character.
As the Count loses everything that once defined him—his title, his wealth, his home, his freedom—he discovers all the things that cannot be confiscated. Grace. Curiosity. Friendship. Purpose. Love.
He also has acquired talents and tastes that he uses with great skill to carve out a life that works despite his circumstances. Life is more of what we bring than what we take.
Towles never suggests that institutions don't matter. They matter profoundly. Tyranny leaves real scars. Freedom is precious.
Yet he also reminds us that there remains a part of every human being that no government can fully possess. And with great character- they never will.
One thought has stayed with me since I finished the novel:
Markets generate prosperity, but they don't generate virtue. Governments can regulate behavior, but they cannot manufacture character.
That work belongs elsewhere—to families, schools, churches, friendships, literature, and the quiet daily habits that shape the human soul.
Rostov's greatest achievement isn't escaping the Metropol. It's refusing to let the Metropol become a prison for his spirit.
As our nation reflects on 250 years of history, I find myself wondering whether flourishing depends as much upon the character of its citizens as it does upon the wisdom of its institutions.
Constitutions, Laws, Markets ..... of course they matter.
But in the end, every society depends upon ordinary men and women who choose honesty over deceit, service over selfishness, courage over fear, and hope over despair.
Perhaps that's why A Gentleman in Moscow lingers long after the final page. It reminds us that while ideas and institutions shape a nation - it takes character to sustain one.
SO that has to be a big part of a flourishing civilization: people who can endure hardship without losing their humanity.
SO like yesterday- I grieve over those who have been robbed by a lack of this instruction.... this discipline which is the root of discipleship.
If you are led to believe your circumstance is some else's fault- what incentive do you have to persevere and make the best of what you have?
A Parable:
Two men inherit neighboring farms. Neither farm is perfect. Both houses leak. Both fences lean. Both fields are overgrown.
The first man spends his days cataloging everything that is wrong. He blames his father for leaving him such a burden. He blames the weather. He blames his neighbors, who seem to have better land. He even blames the birds! He dreams constantly of what someone else should do for him, but he rarely lifts a finger.
The second man also sees the broken roof. He simply climbs the ladder. One shingle today. A fence post tomorrow. A window next week.
The second man lives by simple creeds- "do it now", "a stich in time saves nine" and other lessons of delayed gratification. The first man has no creed... "just live for the moment".
Life is not easy for the second man- some seasons are discouraging. Storms undo months of work. Yet he keeps repairing, planting, building, and thanking God for another day to labor.
Neither man becomes wealthy.
But after forty years, one farmhouse has become a warm home filled with laughter, grandchildren, fruit trees, and well-worn paths. The other has become more broken than when it was inherited.
Eventually their children inherit both places.
The children from the neglected farm look across the fence. "It isn't fair," they say.
"They have so much more than we do."
So they seize the neighboring farm.
But within a generation, the same roof leaks. The same fences collapse. The same weeds return.
Just because you inherited a house doesn't mean you inherited the habits that built it.
That is what the Count taught me... he took a prison and made it marquee.....
Civilizations are sustained less by what they possess than by the virtues that created those possessions.
Post-script: One last note about perseverence/grit/guts:
When I was a freshman at Alabama in 1982—Coach Bryant's final season—I remember hearing several of the senior players talk about something they simply called "toughness." They wondered whether our team had been hardened enough to win a championship the way Bryant's earlier teams had. As a freshman, I had no basis for comparison, but the conversation stayed with me. They weren't talking about talent or size. They were talking about grit—the kind that is forged through hardship, discipline, shared sacrifice, and the confidence that comes from having endured difficult things together.
I sometimes wonder the same thing about our country. I have little doubt that our military possesses that kind of grit, but what about us as a society? When I rewatched Apocalypse Now, I was reminded of Colonel Kurtz's unsettling observation that victory in a difficult struggle requires an unshakable resolve. While the film explores that idea in the darkest possible way, it raises a question worth asking: Have comfort, convenience, and ease made us less resilient? True grit isn't cruelty or bravado. It's the quiet ability to persevere, to sacrifice, to remain steadfast when circumstances become painful, and to hold fast to what is right even when doing so comes at a cost. Championship teams—and enduring nations—are rarely defined by talent alone. More often, they are defined by the character they have forged long before the crisis arrives.
Religio peperit divitias, et filia devoravit matrem.
Religion gave birth to riches, and the daughter devoured the mother.
_ quoted by Cotton Mather in Magnalia Christi Americana (1702). Mather explicitly says he is quoting an older Latin proverb, suggesting it was already well known before his time.
I will be out of town for a bit and when I return, I plan on finishing the How Nations Flourish- 5 Books series (God willing) before the end of July.
No comments:
Post a Comment